Tops and Bottoms
B. J. Becker-Dorothy Hayden
vs Victor Mitchel-Sam Stayman
A strong
candidate for the most remarkable hand ever played took place in the 1964
United States Pair Trials. In those days selection of the international team
was made up of the top three finishers from a tournament of 16 successful
partnerships. Eash pair played a long match against each other pair. The hands
were duplicated at all eight tables, and scoring by IMPs (International Match
Points) was averaged out across the field. A battle for one of the three top
spots took place betwen two of the most famous partnerships of that decade:
Becker-Hayden and Mitchell-Stayman. A misunderstanding in the bidding led
B. J. Becker to an end position that he dreams about to this day. As for
Vic Mitchell, it is said that he aged faster than his due, and never slept more
than five hours a night after this hand was completed.
Mr. Becker sat South and
picked up:
A K 9 6
J 9 2
4
K J 9 8 3
All vulnerable, he opened 1. Sam passed. Dorothy (today she is
Dorothy Hayden Truscott) responded 1. Victor passed and B. J. rebid
1. With silence from the opponents,
Dorothy jumped to 3 and B. J. gently raised to 4. Dorothy now cue bid 4. B. J. sat back and considered
his call. What would you bid?
He came to certain
conclusions, and the auction was completed:
B. J. |
Dorothy |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
? |
|
B. J. bid 6!
Having heard his partner
bid diamonds, clubs, and spades, it was not very likely she had more than one
heart. This looked like a perfect fitting hand. The opening lead was the 2 and when dummy hit the table,
B. J., as always, kept his poker face.
|
Q 8 |
|
10 6 3 |
|
|
A Q J 9 6 |
|
|
A Q 4 |
|
|
5 4 3 |
|
J 10 7 2 |
A 8 5 |
K Q 7 4 |
|
K 5 3 2 |
10 8 7 |
|
10 5 2 |
7 6 |
|
|
A K 9 6 |
|
J 9 2 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
K J 9 8 3 |
|
"B. J.: The awful contract reached was due to an arrangement we had
made six months earlier to treat 4 in this sequence as Gerber for
aces. Dorothy remembered but I didn't, and I foolishly assumed her 4 bid identified a singleton heart. But
this dreadful error luckily resulted in one of the most dramatic end-plays ever
seen!"
Meanwhile poor Victor was
sitting there with the king and queen of hearts waiting for the unbid suit to
be led. Smoke curled up from his cigarette as Sam selected his lead. However
when the deuce of diamonds hit the table the kibitzers claim smoke also steamed
out of his ears. But could Sam be blamed for not leading his heart ace? He had
also done some astute figuring. Why lead an ace only to catch a singleton? Whereas
a diamond lead would put declarer to an immediate guess. There was a good
chance B. J. would think he had a singleton. Or was there?
B. J.: "I could
see no better play than to finesse and hope for the best."
The finesse worked, and it
looked like his only hope was that the diamond king would fall after he played
the ace and ruffed one. It didn't fall, and B. J. was a trick short. It
would do him no good to ruff a spade and be left with two heart losers in hand,
so he went after an extra diamond trick. A club was led to the ace and another
diamond was trumped in hand. A spade ruff now would not permit the fifth
diamond to be cashed (trumps had to be drawn); so B. J. drew trumps ending
in dummy and led the fifth diamond. At this point Victor crushed his cigarette
butt and felt an unpleasant throbbing in his head. Let's see why:
On the diamond, Vic had to
throw one of his heart honors. B. J. discarded his heart nine, Sam threw a
spade, and B. J. began to feel the warm glow that comes over an expert
declarer once, maybe twice, in a lifetime when a position develops that he has
never seen before. The spade queen was cashed and a spade led towards the
A-K-9. Vic seemed to have little choice. He split his honors and B. J. won
with his ace. The last three cards looked like this:
|
– |
|
10 6
3 |
|
|
– |
|
|
– |
|
|
– |
|
J 7 |
A 8 5 |
K |
|
– |
– |
|
– |
– |
|
|
K 9 |
|
J |
|
|
– |
|
|
– |
|
On the lead of the heart jack, Sam played low. If he had played the ace (a play
called the "crocodile coup") swallowing up Vic's king, he would have
been end-played—having to lead from his 8-5 of hearts into dummy's 10-6! However
when Victor won the trick and had to lead a spade into declarer's K-9, it was
equally disatrous.
Pamela: Poor Victor. He was squeezed,
double finessed, endplayed and finessed again! I probably would give up bridge
if that happened to me. Or at least shoot my partner for not leading his ace.
Matthew: Don't shoot. The position in which
the defense had a choice of permitting the end-play on Victor or execute the
crocodile coup but being end-played from the West seat is called a
"Winkle". It occurs every fifty years or so. I'm sure Victor would
have preferred not be on the receiving end of it... and if I ever play with
Victor I'll be careful to lead my aces against slams.
Copyright © 2005, Scania
Bridgekonsult